@Wizards_DnD @JeremyECrawford so is there an official answer to the way spells care about a monetary value? If the official answer is "DM discretion", that's fine enough, but will the spell adjust for inflation or deflation, or is it from when you buy it or appraise it?

— Jon Forel (@Jon_4L) July 8, 2019

D&D has no official rules for the fluxation of prices in a living economy. The game’s prices are a fixed abstraction.

If modeling a realistic economy in the game is your bliss, you’ll need to do it without the safety net of official rules. #DnD https://t.co/GlBeurtcqB

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) July 8, 2019

Tweeting too much can give you the flux. Beware! Mr. Crawford, the word is "fluctuation." Your autocorrect must be messing with you. 🧐

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) July 8, 2019

I’m all out of flux.

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) July 9, 2019

Just took another look at the #dnd Battle Master fighter's Feinting Attack maneuver and realized it discriminates against polearm users. Instead of "within 5 feet of you," wouldn't it be fairer if the rule were "within your melee weapon's reach"? @JeremyECrawford

— Keith Ammann (@geeniusatwrok) June 30, 2019

In D&D, a number of features used with a melee weapon work on a target within 5 feet of you. The specification of 5 feet is intentional and works with any melee weapon.

Such features aren't meant to have a variable range, which changes with different reaches. #DnD https://t.co/air3v1gOvu

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) July 1, 2019

Would a Way of the Open Hand monk be limited to picking a single monk weapon? IE If I start with quarterstaff as my weapon, in the beginning, going forward I always have to use a staff as my monk weapon, and can’t grab a short sword and use it later? Thanks! A Way of the Open Hand monk isn't limited to a single monk weapon.

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) June 19, 2019

@JeremyECrawford
Does the Zealot Barbarian's Divine Fury apply multiple times if you focus the same target?

— Thaison Gimenez (@thaisonrg) June 5, 2019

Divine Fury deals its extra damage no more than once on each of your turns. #DnD https://t.co/t8kmLhV1vQ

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) June 5, 2019

While I am unsure if it is not explicitly stated, I would assume that casting a spell (especially Wizard) would require a minimum INT. Kind of like multi-classing has minimum requirements. There really is no Intelligence minimum.

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) May 7, 2019

Curious as to the thought process behind this? Is it some balance thing that I'm just not getting because it doesn't make much sense to me, personally. I might have to house rule it.

— Travis Hughes (@TheRogueX) May 7, 2019

Spellcasting doesn't have an Intelligence prerequisite in D&D because much of the spellcasting in the game isn't based on how smart you are. Spellcasting can be based on Wisdom, Charisma, or Intelligence, depending on your class or some other trait. #DnD https://t.co/zmi9VLnDG7

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) May 7, 2019

So I know this is a really old post but if the caster polymorphs themselves into an intelligence 1 or 2 creature, please explain why it doesn't interrupt concentration on spells?

— Travis Hughes (@TheRogueX) May 6, 2019

The ability to cast spells and concentrate on one has no Intelligence prerequisite in D&D, unless a rule tells you otherwise. #DnD https://t.co/wWqILsMLE5

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) May 7, 2019

But aren't Polymorphed targets limited to their natural actions of their new form?
I've seen everyone just acting as their normal selves when polymorphed, even forming plans and following directions.

— Brachy [Commissions Closed] (@BrachyZoid) May 7, 2019

The ability to concentrate on a spell doesn't require you to be a member of a particular species or creature type.

The rule on concentration is a general rule that works no matter who is doing the concentrating. #DnD https://t.co/O9FXr0H55g

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) May 7, 2019

@matthewmercer @mattcolville @ChrisPerkinsDnD @JeremyECrawford curious your thoughts — when one has invisibility cast upon them unknowingly, do they know they’re invisible? I imagine they could come to the conclusion shortly thru various ways, but at the initial moment? Thx

— — (@scar_dnd) March 21, 2019

If you're turned invisible without knowing it, you're in for a spooky discovery:

"Mm, that donut looks delicious …"

[reaches for donut]

"Where the hell did my hand go?!" #DnD https://t.co/Ai6Hxls51b

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) March 22, 2019