Given the DragonMarks are subraces, does this mean the Artificer’s Magic Item Savant allows you to ignore them for the purpose of attuning to magic items as it allows you to ignore all class, race, spell and level reqs or are they not part of the actual race? The artificer can ignore the requirement!
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) February 12, 2020
@HellcowKeith @JeremyECrawford I noticed that the Quori and the inspired arent Immune to Unconscious and more notably arent immune to magical sleep.If you were to put a Quori to sleep, where would it go, could another quori invade its dream? would it affect them like banishment?
— sam scott (@appleye4) August 19, 2020
When a dream creature enters the realm of dreams, it's like the movie Inception—mutable realities layered on each other.
Dreams within dreams within dreams within … #DnD https://t.co/6VNBFKvCb6
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) August 20, 2020
This question relates to the SCAG errata regarding Booming Blade… does the monetary value of the component now negate being able to use your Pact of the Blade weapon or Shadow Blade in conjunction with Booming Blade?
— Baumer Goodtree (@BigBaumer) November 11, 2020
If a D&D warlock creates a weapon with Pact of the Blade, that weapon has the value indicated in chapter 5 of the Player's Handbook (the text of Pact of the Blade directs the reader to that chapter to choose the weapon).
Shadow blade, in contrast, weaves together gloom. #DnD https://t.co/aKwfyUduo3
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 11, 2020
Don’t suppose you’re willing to explain the reasoning, here? The Pact of the Blade feature instructs you to pick a weapon from chapter 5 of the Player's Handbook. There you find the information for the weapon you chose, including its gp value, damage, weight, and properties.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 12, 2020
Also, what is the value of an Improvised Weapon in this regard? Is it based on the value of the object?
— Dave 🔂 (@Glistam) November 11, 2020
Items in D&D have the value specified for them in the "Equipment" chapter of the Player's Handbook. If an item doesn't appear there or in another rulebook, the DM determines that item's value, if any. #DnD https://t.co/KsrskTh5p6
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 12, 2020
The Shadow Blade itself says “It counts as a simple melee weapon with which you are proficient.” All simple melee weapons are given a value as per Chapter 5 of the Player’s Handbook, and all those values allow it to work with the new version of Booming Blade.I can't stop finding ways to make it work, all RAW and supported by Jeremy's rulings (per the warlock pact weapon and improvised weapons).
— Dave 🔂 (@Glistam) November 12, 2020
As DM, I'd totally let the combo work. Shadow Blade creates a simple melee weapon, and if another rule cares about that weapon's value, I'd pick a value from the list of simple melee weapons in the Player's Handbook and apply that value ad hoc to the shadowy blade.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 12, 2020
When a D&D rule uses the word "can"—as in "you can give high fives to up to three creatures within 5 feet of you"—it means you are able to do the thing. "Can" doesn't mean you must do it. #DnD
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 11, 2020
But if you don’t, I’ll be really sad you left me hanging, bro. 😢 Here's one for you! 🖐️
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 11, 2020
Twin and War Caster have always been different enough to have unique rulings. Twinned Spell requires the spell to be incapable of targeting more than one creature. For War Caster, it doesn't matter how many creatures the spell CAN target, only that it IS only targeting ONE.
— DMDanDanFielding (@DMdandanfieldng) November 11, 2020
Twinned Spell and War Caster in D&D both care about number of targets. But their descriptions define that concern in different ways, and they intentionally play differently. @DMdandanfieldng describes perfectly below how the difference in wording creates different effects. #DnD https://t.co/HWX3rfdnAs
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 11, 2020
Can you elect to not hit a second target with Geen Flame Blade even if one is in range?
— Roger Giovannangeli (@WrathfulOgre) November 11, 2020
Yesterday the Green-Flame Blade spell received updated wording (link below) that, among other tweaks, clarifies that the spellcaster can choose whether to launch green fire at a second target: https://t.co/sSnpLkq6bV #DnD https://t.co/ac9ooYnOoe
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 11, 2020
A note about D&D spells with a range of "Self (XYZ)": the parenthetical—which says "5-foot radius," "15-foot cone," or something else—means you are the spell's point of origin, but you aren't necessarily its target. You're creating an effect that originates in your space. #DnD
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 11, 2020
( still very sad that y’all nerfed booming blade to not work with war caster Booming blade works with War Caster.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 11, 2020
Related to this note and the new errata to spells like Booming Blade and Green-Flame Blade – does the new range of "Self (5-foot radius)" on these spells mean they no longer work with War Caster?
— DMDanDanFielding (@DMdandanfieldng) November 11, 2020
The Booming Blade spell continues to work with the War Caster feat. The spell targets one creature.
The Green-Flame Blade spell continues to work with War Caster if you forgo targeting a second creature with the green fire. #DnD https://t.co/s0p1YicLTU
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 11, 2020
I dare not invoke the sacred emerald flame recklessly.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 11, 2020
I asked this a while back, but can you use the Maneuvers Battle Master gets with a Monks Unarmed Strike?
— The Defender (@Battlemaster0) November 9, 2020
In D&D, many Battle Master maneuvers work with unarmed strikes.
In fact, an unarmed strike can be used with any melee weapon attack, unless the text of that attack specifically mentions a weapon or something else that would make an unarmed strike impossible. #DnD https://t.co/uNfQ1YfqWO
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 9, 2020
Does this include the melee weapon cantrips Booming Blade and Green-Flame Blade? The booming blade and green-flame blade spells specify that they are used with a weapon, so an unarmed strike isn't eligible.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 9, 2020
