Trying one more time.
Am I correct to assume that I do not need to use any action to command my familiar from "Find Familiar"?— Vinh X Vo (@DaAznEnterprise) January 12, 2018
Some spells, such as find familiar, and other effects refer to you commanding a creature you create/summon/dominate. Unless the effect says that command requires an action/reaction, the command falls under the normal rules for speech. #DnD https://t.co/LTiqy2CQ9f
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) January 12, 2018
@JeremyECrawford can you take Mage Initiate more than once, if you choose from a different class list?
— Blackstone (@Prof8BJ) January 29, 2018
No feat can be taken more than once, unless the text of the feat says otherwise. #DnD https://t.co/K8c0yNe3la
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) January 29, 2018
Question about an item from XtGE, the Ruby of the War Mage. If it is attached to a Longsword +1, will that +1 apply to spell attacks also? No.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) December 20, 2017
@JeremyECrawford can you cast dragon breath on your familiar?
— Find familiar (@familiar_find) December 19, 2017
Dragon's breath is cast on a willing creature. Your familiar is a creature that can be willing. Find familiar prevents a familiar from attacking, but dragon's breath involves no attack. #DnD https://t.co/GsCXwE63CN
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) December 19, 2017
Branching off of this, can you stack a Stunning Strike with an Open Hand effect?
— RPG Enlightenment (@RPGEnlightened) January 12, 2018
Nothing prevents that combination.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) January 12, 2018
does a wand of the war mage affect healing spells to, such as cure wounds? The wand's bonus benefits only your spell attack rolls.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) December 13, 2017
@JeremyECrawford When the rules for making an attack or casting a spell talk about targeting an object, is it implied that it's an unattended object, or it possible to target someone's armor/shield directly with an attack in an attempt to damage/break it?
— Armando Doval (@armando_doval) January 29, 2018
Is this balanced, in practice? When facing someone in Plate with a Shield (AC 21) mightn’t it trivialize the fight to target and destroy their armor (AC19, 10hp)? Negating worn armor for the low cost of one weapon attack seems incredibly powerful. You'll be happy to know that few things in the game do this.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) January 30, 2018
The base rules for damaging objects don’t specify unattended, so any character or monster can do it with a basic attack. Am I missing something? Those rules are entirely in the DM's hands. Using those rules, the DM is encouraged to rule that certain types of attacks/damage do nothing to certain objects. Those rules don't provide a foolproof way to wreck plate.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) January 30, 2018
I’m curious about the decision to require using half your movement to get up from prone. Seems odd if I have 30 it’s 15 if I have 300 it’s 150? How come a static number wasn’t used?Because we wanted you to use half your speed.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) January 29, 2018
