@JeremyECrawford Do spells with a range of "Self" have a target? Is the caster the target? Trying to figure out Find Steed's spell sharing.
— enormousturtle (@enormousturtle) May 17, 2015
A range of self means the caster is the target, as in shield, or the point of origin, as in thunderwave (PH, 202). https://t.co/pojyAyYVoL
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) June 3, 2015
Kid Masters!
You can download your official epic adventure module here: http://media.wizards.com/2015/downloads/dnd/MonsterSlayers.pdf
A Dungeons & Dragons® Adventure for Ages 6 and Up
“Monster Slayers,” a #DnD adventure for kids, breaks my brain with adorableness. Thanks, @susanjmorris and Emi Tanji! http://t.co/8DEmLp5Pnd
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) June 11, 2015
Monster Slayers is back! http://t.co/nKSNtvYctO
— Mike Mearls (@mikemearls) June 11, 2015
@CathexesIncDoes Durable affect Second Wind?
No, since Second Wind doesn't use Hit Dice.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) May 30, 2015
Dragon Slayers!
A new Dragon + is here and it has an amazing cover picture
Open your smartphone or tablet and will load the Dragon+ number 2.
In this issue:
@Doc_Sunso with the eratta out my players are still fighting about twin spelling aoe spells. they claim NO targets so it can be 1/2
they are wrong
— Mike Mearls (@mikemearls) June 11, 2015
@Doc_SunAwesome So Fireball or any similar aoe spell can not be twined? correct!
— Mike Mearls (@mikemearls) June 11, 2015
Addressing a nuance in the PH errata: the rule lets melee weapon attacks use unarmed strikes, despite those strikes not being weapons.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) June 10, 2015
@JeremyECrawford Does this mean unarmed strikes bypass resistance to bludgeoning damage from nonmagical weapons?
— Jonathan Longstaff (@pukunui81) June 11, 2015
The intent is resistance to nonmagical bludgeoning damage, regardless of source (MM errata preview). https://t.co/ejcDpHS2V2
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) June 11, 2015
@pukunui81What is the idea behind making unarmed strikes not weapons? How does this change affect monks?
Unarmed strikes never should have appeared as weapons, hence the correction. The monk is barely affected.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) June 11, 2015
@DnDJesterExcept that monks can no longer use Stunning Strike (level 5) with unarmed strikes.
A monk can still use Stunning Strike with an unarmed strike. @pukunui81
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) June 11, 2015
@JestaKillaBut what problem does this solve? How does this improve the game? Not seeing it, trying to understand. The unarmed strike mistake caused a number of problems in the system. See Dueling in the fighter for one example. @pukunui81
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) June 17, 2015
@pukunui81 Re: errata – why not add ray of sickness to warlock spell list? It’s thematically appropriate enough.Doing so would have been beyond the scope of the changes, which were focused on correcting errors.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) June 11, 2015
@pukunui81Mightn’t the error simply have been omitting the spell from the warlock spell list?
If that was the error, we certainly would have corrected it.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) June 11, 2015