We need your thoughts about UA Artificer

Create Your Own Eberron D&D Adventures @ Dungeon Masters Guild

3 thoughts on “We need your thoughts about UA Artificer

  1. Caron Mitchell says:

    I wanted to love it, but…meh. It feels underpowered and limiting of creativity. Simply put, very clunky.

  2. august clark says:

    One of my players is using an artificer right now while his main is out of action, and it has been a fun addition. Other characters are a little afraid of him because he never declares the spell name, he just describes how he casts it (and I know what it is on his sheet) so it often makes the effects seem unpredictable.

    I like the class overall. I am a lite Concerned with viability of the pets at upper levels of play in that magnitude of their damage/healing never goes up and they dont really learn new tricks. I would also love to see some more infusion options, or else some balanced guidelines for letting players define their own.

  3. You doesn’t need a new class, we need a better craft system. A better table of magic items, one which includes an improved classification and cost. The actual system is not balanced. Improve the craft system and then artificer could work, and better, we could start playing with gadgeteer rogues, fighters, wizards, etc…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.