@JeremyECrawford Tabaxi Rogue With Second Story Work. Would this mean they could climb 20ft with no check or full movement?
— Steven Connor (@Mazoshi1987) November 21, 2016
If you have Second-Story Work and a climbing speed, use your walking speed with the feature or your climbing speed, whichever you like. #DnD https://t.co/QOlAHLIY9f
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 22, 2016
@JeremyECrawford Does a Lizardman monk or Barbarian have an AC of 13 plus Dex and Con/Wis modifiers?
— Daniel Fiander (@ScoutManDan) November 13, 2016
Different AC calculations (X + Dex/Wis/etc. mod.) don't stack (see PH, 14). If you have more than one, you choose which one to use. #DnD https://t.co/HVVfdOFp7s
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 14, 2016
@JeremyECrawford Are Tabaxi claws considered finesse weapons?
— Klaumbaz (@Klaumbaz) November 6, 2016
Nothing is a finesse weapon unless it explicitly has the finesse property. Tabaxi claws don't have that property. #DnD https://t.co/ALnizC2dEt
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 6, 2016
@JeremyECrawford Thats weird, because a lot of monsters in the DMG use claws, and use DEX to calcular their attacks
— Oniguma (@Oniguma) November 6, 2016
Using Dexterity with a weapon doesn't make it a finesse weapon. Having the finesse property makes it a finesse weapon. #DnD https://t.co/iNEVhw9SjG
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 6, 2016
@wetsailIf nothing else, just give it the option to be STR/DEX in the eventual Volo errata. Wouldn’t break balance. It currently works as intended.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 6, 2016
@RhysMandrake @wetsailA tabaxi is a lot more like a puma than a housecat. Pumas would more reasonably use Strength, I think. Bingo!
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 7, 2016
@JeremyECrawford @undrhil @ApocalypticTwit So a Tabaxi can use its' "claws" as an unarmed strike? Specifically with TWF?
— jason thomas (@SirDekkard) November 7, 2016
Check out the rule for two-weapon fighting (PH, 195). It relies on weapons that have the light property, which unarmed strikes lack. #DnD https://t.co/vALayzVifT
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 7, 2016
@KooperKoushiro Is the Lizardfolk’s Hungry Jaws trait usable again on the next turn if it misses, or does a miss still expend the use? It's expended if you hit.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) December 14, 2016
@CaptainBigheadArchdruids in Volo’s Guide: “Change Shape” doesn’t mention HP.. is it intentional that they don’t get HP of their new form? It's intentional.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 23, 2016
@kenshinzenis the monk movememt bonus can be added to the tabaxi climb movement speed or just the basic movement speed? The former.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 14, 2016
@JeremyECrawford does a tabaxi monk get to choose whether their Martial arts unarmed damage is slashing or bludgeoning
— Scott Badalamenti (@Scottbad88) November 14, 2016
An unarmed strike is a punch, kick, etc. A tabaxi can also use claws, which deal slashing damage. Being a monk doesn't change that. #DnD https://t.co/HsyOFYLPkk
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 14, 2016
@DeanMSimmonsThat’s not clear to me … is a claw attack still unarmed? Are you asking about the tabaxi trait (it explicitly answers your question), or are you asking a general rules question?
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 14, 2016
@DeanMSimmons I’m asking if a tabaxi’s claw attacks still qualify as an unarmed strike – your answer was not clear to me. Have you read the tabaxi's racial trait? I'm trying to see if you find the text unclear or if you haven't read it.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 14, 2016
