@KooperKoushiro Is the Lizardfolk’s Hungry Jaws trait usable again on the next turn if it misses, or does a miss still expend the use? It's expended if you hit.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) December 14, 2016
Volo’s Guide to Monsters


How does Unarmoured Defence work with Lizardfolk’s scaly skin?
@JeremyECrawford how does Unarmoured Defence work with Lizardfolk's scaly skin?
— The Questionable DM (@QuestionableDM) November 4, 2016
When you have more than one AC calculation that applies, you choose which one to use. #DnD https://t.co/1mGNbAi3vU
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 4, 2016

Archdruids in Volo’s Guide: “Change Shape” doesn’t mention HP…
@CaptainBigheadArchdruids in Volo’s Guide: “Change Shape” doesn’t mention HP.. is it intentional that they don’t get HP of their new form? It's intentional.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 23, 2016

Should Gnoll Flesh Gnawer have a Strength of 14?
@DelugeIA Gnoll Flesh Gnawer (Volo p154): Should it have a Strength of 14? Otherwise attack and damage bonuses don’t jive. It's using its Dex.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) December 5, 2016
@DelugeIADex for a bite attack? Okey dokey. A number of monsters in the MM do this as well.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) December 5, 2016

Will the Reincarnate spell have any official update to account for all Volo’s races added?
@JeremyECrawford Will the Reincarnate spell have any official update to account for all the new races added in SCAG, EE, and Volos?
— Shervyn Karthanal (@ShervynK23) November 29, 2016
The three core rulebooks—PH, MM, and DMG—don't assume you have any other rulebooks. #DnD https://t.co/6MG2bgANQr
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 29, 2016
@ShervynK23So you’re saying there’s a chance 😛 There's no chance that a spell in the PH would be changed to account for things not in the core books.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 29, 2016

Do Aasimar and Tiefling characters register as their respective bloodlines for Divine Sense?
@JeremyECrawford @mikemearls @ChrisPerkinsDnD Do Aasimar and Tiefling characters register as their respective bloodlines for Divine Sense?
— Tim Wilder (@mrprotoman) November 30, 2016
A playable race is humanoid unless it has a racial trait that says otherwise. #DnD https://t.co/faaX7A7Bkk
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 30, 2016
@AiratomePlayable races are ‘Humanoid’ , what about UA Warforged who are classed as ‘Living Constructs’ ? Ok for Cure Wound spells? My tweet was about the races officially in the game.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) December 1, 2016

Are Tabaxi claws considered finesse weapons?
@JeremyECrawford Are Tabaxi claws considered finesse weapons?
— Klaumbaz (@Klaumbaz) November 6, 2016
Nothing is a finesse weapon unless it explicitly has the finesse property. Tabaxi claws don't have that property. #DnD https://t.co/ALnizC2dEt
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 6, 2016
@JeremyECrawford Thats weird, because a lot of monsters in the DMG use claws, and use DEX to calcular their attacks
— Oniguma (@Oniguma) November 6, 2016
Using Dexterity with a weapon doesn't make it a finesse weapon. Having the finesse property makes it a finesse weapon. #DnD https://t.co/iNEVhw9SjG
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 6, 2016
@wetsailIf nothing else, just give it the option to be STR/DEX in the eventual Volo errata. Wouldn’t break balance. It currently works as intended.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 6, 2016
@RhysMandrake @wetsailA tabaxi is a lot more like a puma than a housecat. Pumas would more reasonably use Strength, I think. Bingo!
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 7, 2016

Why do the Tabaxi use strength as their modifier for their claw attack?
@JeremyECrawford why do the Tabaxi use strength as their modifier for their claw attack? Would it be fair to make it a dex attack instead?
— Tyler McConnell (@JT_McConnell) November 4, 2016
A melee attack uses Strength by default. If you'd like to use Dex. with your unarmed strikes, I recommend becoming a monk. #DnD https://t.co/kDeNmfS3QT
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 5, 2016
@GX_SigmaWait, natural weapons count as unarmed strikes now? What in my tweet sparks that question?
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 5, 2016
@GX_SigmaI just always thought natural weapon attacks (claw, bite, etc) do not qualify as “unarmed” because they are using “weapons” My tweet doesn't contradict that.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 5, 2016