- #1

- 25

- 0

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter phyphysics
- Start date

- #1

- 25

- 0

- #2

quasar987

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 4,784

- 18

upward lies in the plane of the paper while "out of paper" is perpendicular to it.

- #3

mukundpa

Homework Helper

- 524

- 3

Perpendicular to the paper?? What do you thinK about normal?

- #4

- 25

- 0

- #5

mukundpa

Homework Helper

- 524

- 3

That will depend on direction of magnetic field and that of current. Use Fleming's left hend rule.

- #6

quasar987

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 4,784

- 18

perpendicular and normal are synonim

- #7

mukundpa

Homework Helper

- 524

- 3

but I think that perpendicular is to a line and normal is to a plane.

- #8

quasar987

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 4,784

- 18

After a bit of research, I think both terms are good here.

Mathworld says for the definition of 'normal vector':

"The normal vector, often simply called the "normal," to a surface is a vector**perpendicular** to it."

So it makes sense to talk about a vector perpendicular to a surface (we knew that of course).

'Normal' is just a more sophisticated way of saying the same thing.

And it doesn't seem right to say that 'normal' and 'perpendicular' are synonim, because the term normal, as I understand it, can only be used when talking about a vector. So we can say that two planes are*perpendicular* to one another, but we cannot say that they are *normal* to one another.

sources:

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NormalVector.html

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Perpendicular.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_normal

Mathworld says for the definition of 'normal vector':

"The normal vector, often simply called the "normal," to a surface is a vector

So it makes sense to talk about a vector perpendicular to a surface (we knew that of course).

'Normal' is just a more sophisticated way of saying the same thing.

And it doesn't seem right to say that 'normal' and 'perpendicular' are synonim, because the term normal, as I understand it, can only be used when talking about a vector. So we can say that two planes are

sources:

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NormalVector.html

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Perpendicular.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_normal

Last edited:

- #9

mukundpa

Homework Helper

- 524

- 3

So will it be correct to say that two vectors are normal to each other if angle between them is 90.

- #10

quasar987

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 4,784

- 18

I would say 'no'. 'Normal' is only used to describe perpendicularity of a vector wrt a plane.

Have you seen this used in a textbook before? I think they mostly use the term 'orthogonal', which is a synomim to perpendicular when talking about simple object such as lines, vectors, planes, etc., but actually extend to more abstract mathematical objects as the generalisation of the notion of perpendicularity.

See https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=81294&highlight=orthogonal

Have you seen this used in a textbook before? I think they mostly use the term 'orthogonal', which is a synomim to perpendicular when talking about simple object such as lines, vectors, planes, etc., but actually extend to more abstract mathematical objects as the generalisation of the notion of perpendicularity.

See https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=81294&highlight=orthogonal

Last edited:

- #11

mukundpa

Homework Helper

- 524

- 3

Thanks for your valuable explainations.

Share: