@JeremyECrawford @mikemearls I know advantage doesn't stack; and advantage and disadvantage cancel each other out. What if you have two advantage conditions and only one disadvantage condition?
— TARogue (@originaltarogue) March 24, 2018
Advantage and disadvantage cancel each other regardless of the number of things that give either of them to you. Either you have advantage/disadvantage or you don’t. Instances of them don’t stack up. #DnD https://t.co/ZzYzEf4Lqe
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) March 24, 2018
Is it just me, or did that not answer the question?
If there are two effects/situations that would each (in isolation) grant me advantage, and one effect that would (in isolation) grant me disadvantage, do I still have advantage or not?— the Sage (@the_Sage_BB) March 24, 2018
The system asks this question: are any number of things granting you advantage? If yes, you have advantage. The number of those things is irrelevant. It could be one. It be a million. Disadvantage works the same way. #DnD https://t.co/O43tBkm8Fa
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) March 24, 2018
The point I am getting if I am correct, is that advantage and disadvantage cancel each other, and the number of them for or against doesn’t matter–it simplifies things. That’s correct
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) March 24, 2018
in video game terms, they don’t stack actually the etymology of that use of “stack” seems like it might originate from ttrpgs… hmmMmmMmm
— kate welchhhh (@katewelchhhh) March 24, 2018
Jeremy I just came to an incredible realization: it’s Saturday wtf are we doing We’re being nerds. That’s what we’re doing.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) March 24, 2018