Can D&D embrace the metric system?
— Victor Nedelchev (@vicnedel02) May 22, 2017
1.524-meter squares?! https://t.co/xEvCZ3QPmV
— Christopher Perkins (@ChrisPerkinsDnD) May 23, 2017
@ChrisPerkinsDnD Wouldn't be hard. But I actually prefer the Imperial system for D&D, it has a nice archaic feel.
— Colin Maynard (@lord_Claincy) May 23, 2017
Also makes it easy to convert old adventures. #WOTCstaff https://t.co/doH7qx8dSq
— Christopher Perkins (@ChrisPerkinsDnD) May 23, 2017
@ChrisPerkinsDnD I explored the idea once—1-meter squares are interesting. Easier to convert real-world maps. & 3×3 to the 10-foot squares of old. #wotcstaff
— James Wyatt (@aquelajames) May 23, 2017
@ChrisPerkinsDnD Quick & dirty example, from a book about Angkor. pic.twitter.com/Cp9fHbuGRs
— James Wyatt (@aquelajames) May 23, 2017
@LoganWestbrook @ChrisPerkinsDnDI remember this! Was it published in Dragon Magazine? This map or my exploration of 1-meter squares? You might be thinking of Rich Baker's Rana Mor adventure in Dungeon #86. #wotcstaff
— James Wyatt (@aquelajames) May 23, 2017
@LoganWestbrook @ChrisPerkinsDnDI thought both, but definitely the 1-metre squares. Maybe you remember my Gleemax blog! #WOTCstaff
— James Wyatt (@aquelajames) May 23, 2017