@mikemearls do you regret after 13yr the phb races/classes are all FR/grayhawk/dragonlance no #eberron baked in at core level & MM the same?
— JM (@JM13136849) July 8, 2017
No – Eberron very consciously went against the shared lore of the settings, making it hard to fit in. #wotcstaff https://t.co/ek4UotpG1g
— Mike Mearls (@mikemearls) July 9, 2017
fairenough, but that leaves eberron GM’s left telling players “”no PHB is wrong, ignore it read full ECS” very often, any hope for them?
— JM (@JM13136849) July 9, 2017
Will eventually tackle Eberron, just harder to work into core material as an example that supports the core, shared pieces of D&D #wotcstaff https://t.co/gCZIIgDnkc
— Mike Mearls (@mikemearls) July 9, 2017
On the one hand "settings are too similar and generic". On the other hand "settings are too radical and different for homebrewers to use".
— David Shepheard (@ShepheardDavid) July 10, 2017
1. Find shared ground for all settings.
2. Build unique elements from/on that.
Keeps D&D recognizable, but allows for lots of directions. https://t.co/yFE3m9dKvw— Mike Mearls (@mikemearls) July 10, 2017
Thanks for giving us hope, Mr. Mearls. Please, sit down and have some cake we made to celebrate #Eberron13th Anniversary. pic.twitter.com/s9hvUPuosX
— Gonzalo Campoverde (@gcampoverde) July 10, 2017