@JeremyECrawford Whenever you're mounted, where do your attacks, auras, etc. originate from? Keeping in mind that we're talking about a medium creature on a large mount. Do you just treat the PC as a large creature and go with it, or what?

— willaien (@willaien) November 8, 2017

Being mounted doesn't change your character's size. #DnD https://t.co/mZCRSoygnN

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 8, 2017

so would the aura originate from the centre of the mount? i.e. where you are on the mount?

— Matt Webb (@MattWebb09) November 8, 2017

Where are you on your mount? Wherever you moved on the mount. Your character doesn't become abstracted when you mount something. #DnD https://t.co/PAvt3xtwxJ

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 8, 2017

So you move within your mount's squares (if it's larger than you), using regular movement to do so? Meaning there can be times when an enemy can attack you but not your mount.

Thanks for your time clarifying things!

— willaien (@willaien) November 8, 2017

As DM, I’d place the rider’s miniature near the center of the horse.

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 10, 2017

Moving on your mount uses the movement rules. #DnD https://t.co/OE3y71HwfE

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 8, 2017

I could be wrong as I cannot site a source for this info but the point of origin is anywhere on the mount and the rider can be targeted anywhere his mount occupies. The rider’s size, as @JeremyECrawford explained, does not change. You're referring to a rule from a previous edition.

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 8, 2017

Ahh. Thank you. I fall into this line of thinking every once and a while. It’s hard to unlearn. So, the rider is simply a miniature on another miniature and is targeted and targets just like normal?That's correct.

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 8, 2017

@JeremyECrawford Can Hunter's Mark be applied to attacks made by Tabaxi claws? Found many opinions but no clear answer on this. Thx

— Charlzroy (@Charlzroy) October 18, 2017

An unarmed strike counts as a weapon attack, so hunter's mark works with it. #DnD https://t.co/TQ2L5aLJXk

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) October 18, 2017

ok so, yo, does this mean rosie’s stunning strike can work on her punches and kickems??? Yes. ✨

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) October 18, 2017

@JeremyECrawford Question, If a Sorcerer/Warlock was to have Hex on a target and then cast Magic Missiles at the same target, what would the damage be like?

— Stephen Saunders (@Thordin2017) November 29, 2017

The hex spell benefits attacks, which means something that is called an attack or that includes an attack roll. Spells like magic missile and fireball involve no attacks. #DnD https://t.co/3GBi7RMgnb

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 29, 2017

@mikemearls @JeremyECrawford Adamantine Armor says “any critical hit against you becomes a normal hit.”, but why does it effect spell crits? Book says it’s reinforced armor from the hardest substance on earth. Why would a super hard ore prevent, dmg from a psychic spell crit?

— Kantrism (@Kantrism) November 8, 2017

Adamantine armor is a magic item. It’s not a chunk of ore. #DnD https://t.co/qUdnQrmpi7

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 8, 2017

@mikemearls @JeremyECrawford Can a Warlocks bond with a +1 Bow for their Pact Weapon?

— John Appleton (@jaa0109) February 29, 2016

A pact weapon must be a melee weapon (PH, 107). #DnD https://t.co/qYEmijX5sD

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) March 1, 2016

The Sage Advice Compendium is correct. I delve there into the exception involving magic weapons.

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) January 7, 2018

@JeremyECrawford Does light from a magic weapon’s characteristics (not via a spell) count as magical that can illuminate a Darkness spell?

— Matt Freeman (@MrMattFree) April 20, 2016

Darkness cares only about light created by a spell. #DnD https://t.co/MDMQJAzBak

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) April 20, 2016

Shedding some light on a previous tweet …

Light from any magical source can illuminate the area of a darkness spell, but the darkness spell can dispel light created by a spell of 2nd level or lower, not light created by a non-spell. #DnD https://t.co/qYoVonNoyT

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) January 5, 2018

This is incredibly confusing, he said any magical light can illuminate a darkness. Does he mean any magical light above spell lvl 3?

— Eric Hall (@ericwithaz) January 5, 2018

More about the darkness spell …

See the final paragraph of the darkness spell for what it does to a light spell of 2nd level or lower. If a source of magical light is not a spell of 2nd level or lower, darkness can be illuminated by that light. #DnD https://t.co/R1pvnQwOUz

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) January 5, 2018

What about light coming from a magical item? Sun blade, flame tongue, etc. Would you consider those effects capable of lighting the darkness?

— Jami Gayle (@Jami_Gayle_) January 5, 2018

The sun blade is magic item. It produces light. It is not a spell of 2nd level or lower. It can, therefore, illuminate the area of a darkness spell. #DnD https://t.co/TwTQFd7yFI

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) January 5, 2018

So in lame terms a torch can illuminate inside the darkness sp5

— Arron Acquaviva (@Egore27) January 5, 2018

A torch is an item that produces nonmagical light. Nonmagical light can't penetrate the area of the darkness spell. #DnD https://t.co/fDoZib8UTC

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) January 5, 2018

Can’t the exact same logic be applied to it NOT illuminating the same area?No.

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) January 5, 2018