These #dnd@DnD_AdvLeague tips aren’t fully baked yet but I’d love to get some feedback on them. For those fully immersed in the Adventurer’s League, how do these feel to you? pic.twitter.com/H5rX5SY8Ns
Hey all worried about gold for the new TCP system, just remember with the buying/selling armor loophole, you can trade one adventure's worth of T1 points (2) to make 375 gp (half plate) or three T2 pts to make 750 gp. That's a more than you would have gotten in the current system
Well, @mikemearls is the super talented designer who came up with the Advancement and Treasure Point system! It was built based on feedback from AL players and the tendency for adventures to hand out way too much treasure
Next time there is ANY form of negative feedback about AL, why not bring it to us the community and discussed it to resolve it. If this had been done months ago with the community that is AL on ALFB where there is 26,000 members we could have helped laid the problem to rest. We’ve consistently found that social media posts don’t align with what the greater community is looking for. Part if the equation, but one among many.
I want to know this to and will tell the AL community of FB what you say is what is the best way for us the AL community to be heard👍🏼💯 It’s one factor among several. Most players don’t engage at all on social media, so we use surveys and studies to reach them. There’s no reason to stop talking, just don’t assume that one data point is the story.
Now, the reverse is also true. The FB group might represent the general trend. Generally the broader trend is toward different concerns. For instance, in the 5e playtests online discussion usually favored more complexity than we saw in the general audience.
In this case, we’re seeing a pretty big disconnect between what people want from AL and what they feel it delivers. Hence, the changes. Revisions from this point will fall into two buckets. Details like the rate of GP earned and what adventures can award, are easy tactical tweaks. Those are also places where SM is a lot more on point, because expert DMs and players are informed and give actionable feedback.
The broader picture question – why is organized play for RPGs not connecting with the broader audience – is something that requires more global feedback and study.
Is the system instantaneous? If a not-insignificant bribe needs to go out, and the amount is, say 3K GP, is it going to be a situation of “Oh damn I have 20K gold equivalent in points, but didn’t convert it pre-session”? That strikes me as penalizing a particular playstyle. The changes (once we get gather all the feedback and write the final versions) go live with s8 on August 30.
I’ve DM’ed and played over 1,000 hours of AL in the last 3 years and never once encountered a player who wanted less gold. Instead they want more things to spend it on even if it’s just cosmetic. I can get behind most of the other changes, but I HATE the gold acquisition change. And that’s something the admins and @Onnatryx will look at and tweak as needed. We have to see how it plays out before adjusting
Mike, gotta say that to me this no longer feels like #dnd. Checkpoints cool, magic items cool, but gold only at a level?
That is a lot of suspension of disbelief to think that I play a few adventures and wait for the gold to be directly deposited into my adventuring account. We’ll see how it plays out. If the amount of gold and how often you earn it is an issue, we’ll make changes. For instance, we could pretty easily tie a GP reward based on tier you gain in addition to each treasure check earned.
I would also like to reiterate, running two league Hexblade characters myself, that the lack of the blade cantrips seriously undermine their potential.@mikemearls@JeremyECrawford Is there a chance to get some kind of errata or non +1 addition to make them part of XGE? https://t.co/TZQ8cLmHSi
So even if the blade singer was reprinted those spells wouldn’t be?
Also I still don’t understand why they weren’t deemed a good fit for hexblades. (since you said it was a thematic reason not mechanical balance one to not include them )1. If we decide to reprint Bladesinging, we'll determine at that time what to do with the SCAG spells.
2. We designed the SCAG spells to be niche. They are a fine fit for the sorcerers, warlocks, and wizards who do use them.
Unfortunately this is one reason why players move from adventurers league to home brews because the phb +1 doesn’t go with their character concept. However I do agree and would like to see an errata making all spells exempt from the +1 rules please If you have feedback about the rules of Adventurers League, make sure to reach out to @DnD_AdvLeague. I set the rules of the game, not the league.
to over clarify, because answers I keep finding are old or disputed – what books have playable races for for AL? (ToA) included?PHB, Elemental Players Guide, and Volo's Guide. Xanathar's has no races, but choosing it as your resource will also include the tortle
Your reply said Xanathars, did you mean Tomb of Annihilation? Also, does this mean Tortles are AL approved PC race? Nope, considered part of Xanathar's, race is AL approved