Thoughts on a monk 1/3 spellcaster subclass following arcane trickster and eldritch knight?

One thought on “Thoughts on a monk 1/3 spellcaster subclass following arcane trickster and eldritch knight?

  1. D. Walker says:

    This concept seems to be stepping pretty heavily on the toes of the Way of The Four Elements monk subclass.

    Now, to be fair, most people seem to agree that the Four Elements monk doesn’t work very well as written, and it has pretty poor popularity as a result. But if you really want to go ahead with a new concept encroaching on the same design space, maybe consider just revamping the Four Elements monk entirely instead of making a separate new one?

    Otherwise you run the risk of the Four Elements having its thematic space stolen out from under it, and it effectively becoming “obsolete” if the new subclass accomplishes the same sorts of goals, but more elegantly and effectively.

Leave a Reply