3 thoughts on “Immunity to bludgeoning: does take damage from falling?

  1. John says:

    That makes no sense. Falling damage is listed as bludgeoning damage, nothing states falling damage is magical, so if you are immune or resistant to non-magical bludgeoning damage it should work on the damage from a fall.

  2. Matt says:

    I read it the same way, John. But the syntax often reads “; and bludgeoning, piercing and slashing from non-magical attacks.” That semi-colon makes all the difference, b/c those words then become modifiers for the word “attacks.” The fall isn’t your “attack” rather it is the result of a spell attack (in this case, a levitation spell).

  3. Dave says:

    The immunity is specifically to “bludgeoning damage from non-magical weapons”. The bludgeoning damage from a fall does not come from a non-magical weapon. To that end, bludgeoning damage that results from a spell–for instance Bigby’s Hand or Earthquake–would still deal damage to a target that is immune to any sort of weapon damage.

Leave a Reply